Sunday, June 23, 2013

Module 4

Reflection on the Theory of Constructivism

According to this theory, people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world, through experiences, and by reflecting on those experiences. At first this sounded to me as though the role of the teacher would become almost redundant, but on reading further, this is not the case. The teacher needs to understand the background knowledge which students bring with them to a particular discipline, and guide activites so that students can use and build upon their knowledge. The teacher needs to provide opportunities for inquiry based learning, collaboration, and authentic assessments.

When I think about the constructivist approach, I find it difficult to see its application in certain subject areas. Grammar, math concepts, and some scientific principles would be difficult for students to acquire in this way. I also think of students who have learning disabilities and need more direct instruction. I think that a constructivist approach would work well in most areas of science, but I do think there will be times when students need to have background information presented to them, before they can proceed with inquiry. Time is another factor to consider, as students work at different paces.

In our science lab last year, we gave students the materials necessary to connect a circuit, and explained how a basic circuit works. We then left them to try to connect their materials in a way that would make the light bulb work. This resulted in team work, and students were very motivated to be the first to get their bulbs to light up. I think this is an example of the constructivist approach.  Students then had to share with others what they had tried and what worked.  I think students like to be given time to test their predictions and work through the scientific method, and this is how I would like to allow students to construct knowledge in my science class. We would need a lot more time in the science lab though, presently we only go twice a month.

 I would like to incorporate more constructivist thinking into my teaching, particularly in the areas of science, math problem solving, and social studies. I see a blend of the two approaches as working well for me, at least in the immediate future.

Fifth Grade Science Standard:

S5P2: Physical and Chemical Change:
 a. Investigate physical changes by separating mixtures and manipulating paper to demonstrate examples of physical change.

Excite
  • Melt ice and boil water
  • Break and stir an egg
  • Mix together different ingredients such as chocloate chips, nuts, raisins.
Explore
  • Watch a Brain Pop video on physical change
  • Find examples throughout the school of change of state, e.g. a carved pole from wood, frozen water in the fishpond.
  • Think of ways to change the state of objects without changing the internal structure, e.g. tearing paper
Explain
  • Write a paragraph about how breaking and stirring the egg represents a change of state.
  • In groups, define and explain what a mixture is.
  • Why a change of state is a physical change, what does "physical" mean?
  • How is the change of state from water to ice, and from water to steam, explained as a physiacl change?
Expand
  • Our mixture can be separated into chocolate chips, raisins, and nuts. What does this tell us about the properties of a mixture?
  • How can this be linked to manipulating paper, and how does this help us explain what a physical change is?
  • Are physical changes always reversible? Is this a good way to define a physical change?
Extend
  • What are some of the factors causing physical changes?
  • If we cook the egg, how is this change different from breaking and stirring the egg?
Exchange
  • Students will create mini-books from construction paper to summarize what they have learned about physical changes. They will share these with other class members.
  • Students will create a chart to display on the wall, which includes all their learning about the properties of a mixture, the nature of a physical change, and a good way to define physical change.
Examine
  • Online searches about physical changes, and start to look at the differences between physical and chemical changes.
  • Compare and contast the changes to the egg when it is broken and stirred, to when it is cooked. Use this as a springboard into chemical changes.

3 comments:

  1. Sally,

    Your post in response to constructivism is very insightful. I especially like how you stated, "The teacher needs to understand the background knowledge which students bring with them to a particular discipline, and guide activities so that students can use and build upon their knowledge". This quote is a very descriptive way to describe to role of a teacher within constructivism.

    I can see your point of view when you say that you could see it being difficult to implement constructivism in certain subject areas. I do however, see how it could be implemented effectively in science education. It allows for students to collaborate and work kinesthetically with other students.

    As I read through all of the constructivism information, I realized how much of a constructivist teacher I really am. I tend to lean towards this type of teaching during science and math specifically though.

    Your standard meets the 7E's in great ways! I have implemented the excitement portion of the 7E's during a lesson like this. We used trail mix and the students were told to separate out the parts of the mix. Under the Explain portion, your students could use a science journal for their paragraphs as well as the rest of the assignments under that section. Students could then share what they wrote about the change of status with the egg.

    Great post! Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sally,

    I understand where you are coming from when you are unsure of how to use constructivism techniques in subjects such as grammar, etc. However, if you think of how the standards have a spiraling effect, more than likely (especially as the students go through the higher grades) the students have a basic understanding of grammar concepts, but we are beginning to simply build on these concepts. Therefore, constructivism is possible, it may just become harder to approach these topics.

    I agree with you that there is a much bigger opportunity to allow students to gather/explore information on their own in subjects like Science and Social Studies, but there isn't as much time to give to these subjects due to the amount of pressure put on ELA and Math. I too wish there was more time to spend on Science and Social Studies in order to give students as much time as they need to explore and make observations about new concepts.

    I really enjoyed reading through your 7E's! They were well thought out and gave me some ideas for similar activities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sally,

    I enjoyed reading how you questioned the constructivist theory instead of just readily accepting it. This makes it clear that you truly thought out how you think this method would affect your students. I agree with you that this may not be the best method for teaching students with learning disabilities; however, I do think that when given challenges, they can often rise above our expectations. I noticed that you thought it may not be the best way to teach math. I actually think that having students' develop their own mathematical thinking is very important. I felt as though the constructivist theory went hand-in-hand with the cognitively guided math instruction we learned about last year. That being said, I agree that it may not be effective for every math concept or every student.
    I enjoyed reading your 7E's because I chose to do my on the same standard. It is funny not that one of our activities was the same! These are ideas that I will definitely consider for next year!

    ReplyDelete